翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Coise
・ Coise-Saint-Jean-Pied-Gauthier
・ Coiserette
・ Coisevaux
・ Coishco District
・ Coisia
・ Coiste Cearta Síbialta na Gaeilge
・ Coiste na n-Iarchimí
・ Coisy
・ Coit
・ Coit Albertson
・ Coit Cleaners
・ Coit D. Blacker
・ Coit Street Historic District
・ Coit Tower
Coit v. Green
・ Coital alignment technique
・ Coital angina
・ Coite-Hubbard House
・ Coitinho River
・ Coitocaecum parvum
・ Coitsville Township, Mahoning County, Ohio
・ Coitus interruptus
・ Coitus reservatus
・ Coitus à unda
・ Coity
・ Coity Castle
・ Coity Higher
・ Coity Mountain
・ Coité do Nóia


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Coit v. Green : ウィキペディア英語版
Coit v. Green

''Coit v. Green'', 404 U.S. 997 (1971), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed a decision that a private school which practiced racial discrimination could not be eligible for a tax exemption.〔See ''Green v. Kennedy'', 309 F.Supp. 1127 (DC 1970), later decision reported sub nom. (Green v. Connally, 330 F.Supp. 1150, summarily aff'd sub nom ) (African-Americans "need not be required to plead and show that, in the absence of illegal governmental encouragement, private institutions would not "elect to forgo 'favorable tax treatment, and that this will' result in the availability to complainants of services previously denied"); ''McGlotten v. Connally'', 338 F.Supp. 448 (DC 1972); ''Pitts v. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue'', 333 F.Supp. 662 (ED Wis.1971) ("As perusal of these reported decisions reveals, the lower courts have not assumed that such allegations and proofs were somehow required by Article Three of the United States Constitution"); ''(''Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welf. Rights. Org.'' )'', 426 U.S. at 64 (1976).〕
==Summary of findings==
In ''Green v. Connally'',〔''Green v. Connally'', 330 F.Supp. 1150 (D.D.C.), aff'd sub nom, ''Coit v. Green'', 404 U.S. 997 (1971).〕 the court declared that neither IRC 501(c)(3) nor IRC 170 provided for tax-exempt status or deductible contributions to any organization operating a private school that discriminates in admissions on the basis of race. Since this time, if a school has adopted and announced a racially non-discriminatory admissions policy and has not taken any overt action to discriminate in admissions, the Service concludes that the school has a racially non-discriminatory admissions policy. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, specifically did not rule on the hypothetical possibility of a school which discriminated against minorities for religious reasons.
In the interim, the IRS took steps to implement the nondiscrimination requirement including Revenue Ruling 71-447, 1971-2 C.B. 230, Revenue Procedure 72-54, 1972-2 C.B. 834, Revenue Procedure 75-50, 1975-2 C.B. 587, and Revenue Ruling 75-231, 1975-1 C.B. 158. Without comment, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia at the end of 1971 for the families in this case.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Coit v. Green」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.